<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WEReveal &#187; micro-blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wereveal.com/tag/micro-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wereveal.com</link>
	<description>Ramblings on the Bible, Family, Food, Programming and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:30:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Trying Out FriendFeed Seriously</title>
		<link>http://www.wereveal.com/technology/trying-out-friendfeed-seriously/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wereveal.com/technology/trying-out-friendfeed-seriously/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 16:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aggregator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FriendFeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[micro-blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pownce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wereveal.com/?p=54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a quick note that, although I have had a FriendFeed account for a while, I finally decided to get a bit serious regarding using it. I am using the wereveal user name, no surprise. Since it is both a micro-blog and an aggregator of other feeds it really does have some benefits over services [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wereveal.com/technology/trying-out-friendfeed-seriously/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter, a Second Look</title>
		<link>http://www.wereveal.com/technology/twitter-second-look/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wereveal.com/technology/twitter-second-look/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[micro-blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pownce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wereveal.com/?p=32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been pondering some more after my first post. People like John Dvorak jumping on the bandwagon got me to relook at the issue. I also received an e-mail from someone who suggested that I needed to follow a lot more people to get a better picture of Twitter. And so, I have started [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wereveal.com/technology/twitter-second-look/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
